Bovine Consecration... Err.

When a temple and numerous believers staged a standoff with the Wales Government, not only did it make headlines back in the country thirsty for controversies but also got splendid support from the e - world.



The scandevala website even featured live footage of the animal resting, pissing and chewing the cud.

But all this backed by a religious belief and not a humane cause.

Why in the world should a desecration come into picture, the "holy cow" as it is eulogized but never been interpreted the way it has to be.

My knowledge about the bovine consecration stems from the fact that the cow had never been mentioned as sacred , but in the Rg veda which says "Cow should not be killed"
The archives from an age when cow was used as a currency, cow was the economy, cow was the wealth. So killing one would basically mean destruction of wealth.
So does it go for eating the meat.Because it cant be eaten without killing it.

The problem is that we don't change. That is in effect right from the case of the archives of hymns that haven't changed for almost 3000 years and people tend to be ignorant of the fact that they were not protocols but eulogies and 'make life better' codes.

Half of the controversies in here arise from the ignorance of the fact that "Change is one thing that doesn't change".

Conclusion: One who kills the cow is an ahindu , so is the one who tears a 100 rupee note :)